"Plural Affinities in Contested Borderlands"
              Dr. Antía  Mato Bouzas 
              The borderland dividing the former Kashmir   related territories can be considered as one of the most conflictive   nodal points in the expanse covered under the Crossroads Asia research   framework. The LOC represents the most contested (symbolic and material)   element in this dispute because it divides the territories that were   part of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir (1846-1947), and   that now have become the peripheries of the large states of India and   Pakistan. Despite being a de facto and not de iure boundary, the LOC   functions as an international boundary and in that way produces   institutionalisation and spatial socialization. It discourages formal   mobility and contact across it, but ties between people on both sides of   the boundary still exist. The recent establishment in 2005 of bus   services and trade relations between some specific towns on both sides   of Kashmir has created new expectations for further mobility and   exchange. Conflict in the Kashmir related territories is manifested in   multiple ways and involves many issues and aspirations. Thus it cannot   only be understood in relation to political claims of specific groups   (Kashmiri, Indian or Pakistani nationalism) and to the product of   competing identities.  
              The sub-project focuses on forms of   self-identification of social groups living in concrete locations on   both sides of the LOC. In this sense, the use of the concept of   ‘identity’ is largely regarded as “membership”, that is, as shared   (secured) affinities related to a place (Taylor 1993, Habermas 1998) but   it does not necessary entail a bounded sense (Bauman 2006). Forms of   self-identification are studied in relation to border people’s   experiences of the past (the Kashmir dispute) and to current   developments that point at important transformations in the region:   incipient mobility, building of great infrastructures, economic and   social transformations, etc. The Kashmir related territories are here   examined from a borderland perspective, historically constructed through   different territorialisation processes that have affected the ways   local groups conceive the space they inhabit.  
  
                
                
              
               
             |